Who Stays Here?
Talent Management in an Exhausted Region
Brain drain, labour shortages and wage inflation: how can large Central European companies respond to labour market challenges with a conscious, skills-focused talent strategy?
Corporate talent management in Central Europe is no longer an HR luxury, but a hard-core competitiveness issue. Millions have left the Visegrád countries for Western Europe, labour shortages have become permanent, and wage inflation has spiralled out of control – while many companies still think in terms of annual “talent lists” checked off once a year. The companies that remain competitive are those that treat talent management not as an administrative exercise, but as a data-driven business strategy focused on skills and capabilities – and reorganise their entire talent pipeline accordingly.
Corporate talent management today is no longer a “nice-to-have” function, but a matter of survival: the entire business model of global companies may depend on whether they are able to systematically attract, develop and retain key employees, especially here in Central Europe.
What do we mean by corporate talent management?
In a corporate environment, talent management is an integrated strategic framework covering the entire chain of workforce planning, recruitment, development, performance management and succession planning.
Within this framework, talent refers to employees who possess critical expertise for the organisation, deliver above-average performance and demonstrate strong commitment, while being expected to create consistently high added value within the company’s key processes. In large corporations, they typically represent around 5–10% of the total workforce, depending on the industry and business model.
Why is talent management a business issue for large companies?
Today, it is difficult to question the business impact of talent management without numerical evidence: according to international comparisons, organisations with mature talent management systems achieve a two- to threefold increase in the proportion of leadership positions filled internally, while turnover in critical roles is 20–30% lower. Translated into practice: in a large company with one hundred leadership positions, a mature talent management system may allow 60–70 positions to be filled entirely through internal succession, while in critical roles only 7–8 employees leave annually instead of 10.
In the Visegrád countries (including Hungary), labour shortages peaked around 2018, dramatically increasing labour costs and recruitment cost-per-position indicators for large companies. Structured talent programmes (such as internal mobility and targeted succession pipelines) measurably improved time-to-fill positions and onboarding indicators.
The evolution of talent management in Central Europe
The development of talent management in the Visegrád region can be divided into several clearly distinguishable eras, from the centrally planned “cadre policy” period before the political transition (where “talent” essentially meant political loyalty), through the post-transition shock therapy period, to the emergence of structured talent management frameworks after EU accession in 2004.
In the years following EU accession, approximately seven million employees moved from Central and Eastern Europe to Western Europe, triggering an unprecedented wave of brain drain and a tangible talent war among large corporations. It was during this period that formally operated graduate programmes, serious leadership succession pipelines and officially documented regional talent management strategies began to appear on a large scale.
The basic framework of corporate talent management
If we were to model it, corporate talent management would be built on four main pillars:
- Strategic workforce planning, which forms the foundation of the programme
- Talent identification and segmentation
- An integrated development and career-path system
- And conscious succession planning combined with risk management.
This framework is specifically adapted to the realities of large corporations: it assumes multinational structures, combinations of service centres and manufacturing hubs, as well as complex matrix organisations where talent pipelines extend across regions and functions.
Talent management maturity levels – where are we as a corporation?
A corporate HR team may reasonably ask: “Fine, but where do we stand in this area?” Research and case studies identify different levels of maturity in talent management, ranging from occasional, ad hoc, project-based initiatives to integrated, data-driven and business-sponsored systems.
Among large corporations operating in the Visegrád region, it is common for the global headquarters to have an advanced talent framework (such as nine-box assessment grids, regular talent review meetings and leadership succession pipelines), while local implementation often fails to reach even a medium level of maturity. Despite strong programme portfolios for talents (internship and succession programmes, leadership academies), these programmes are often not parts of an integrated system, but merely scattered initiatives. Strategic workforce planning, data analysis and succession focus are frequently missing.
Five persistent HR weaknesses hindering talent management
Regional research has identified five recurring weaknesses continuously holding talent management back:
- The frequent exclusion of HR from strategic decision-making
- Outdated job structures
- Weak performance management practices
- Low levels of HR digitalisation
- And underfunded talent development.
This combination often results in talent management becoming campaign-like within large corporations, lacking updated competency frameworks, skills-based job structures and managerial accountability. As a result, programmes struggle to translate into measurable business outcomes.
What is changing now? Artificial intelligence, skills-focused development and sustainability pressure
According to the latest trends, three major forces are shaping corporate talent management today: the rise of artificial intelligence and automation within HR functions; the shift towards skills development instead of task-centred approaches, both in recruitment and promotion decisions; and employer branding pressure linked to sustainability and diversity expectations.
For example, the shift towards skills development instead of task-centred thinking means that talent management is moving away from position-based hierarchies towards broadly transferable competencies (digital skills, adaptability, stakeholder management capabilities). Meanwhile, AI-based tools are increasingly used for talent mapping, supporting internal mobility and predicting turnover at the corporate level.
Typical corporate talent programmes – what does it look like in practice?
Based on the case studies of the Best HR Solutions in V4 Countries international project, a more advanced corporate talent programme portfolio usually includes multi-level elements such as:
- Graduate programmes
- Functional talent groups (for example finance, IT or manufacturing)
- Regional leadership academies
- And succession pipelines built around critical positions.
These programmes frequently include 18–24-month rotational schemes in which participants move across countries and functions with structured mentoring and practical learning projects.
In such programmes, it is no unrealistic expectation that at least one-third – approximately 35–40% – of leadership positions are filled from internal succession pools. In practice, this means that three to four out of ten new leaders come from within the organisation, while retention rates among programme participants are 10–15 percentage points higher than among colleagues at the same level, meaning employees are less likely to leave for competitors.
Is the word “talent” forbidden?
Many large corporations today use the word “talent” cautiously. A significant proportion of employees perceive it as discriminatory when the organisation visibly designates a narrow group of “chosen ones”, while the stable, reliable majority may feel like mere extras.
Employers are also aware of the risks: if the “talent” label is overemphasised, companies may lose the loyal, long-term valuable employees on whom the entire operation depends. This is why more and more organisations prefer expressions such as “company drivers”, “key contributors”, “impact multipliers” or “catalysts”, thereby emphasising that the focus is not on innate genius, but on colleagues who create high added value and play a strategically important role for the organisation.
A Visegrád corporate example – combining service and manufacturing centres
In a typical Central European case study, a global manufacturing company operates both a regional service centre and a manufacturing hub in the Visegrád countries. Due to labour shortages, brain drain and rising wage levels, filling critical positions is becoming increasingly difficult, especially in IT, finance and engineering.
The company’s talent management strategy partly relies on professionals who gained experience abroad and intend to return home (“reverse brain drain”), and partly on skills-development and internal reskilling programmes (for example operator-to-maintenance technician or accounting analyst-to-business partner pathways), where AI-based learning platforms and digital corporate academies play a central role.
Talent management and HR digitalisation – without data there is no strategy
Regional surveys clearly indicate that a significant proportion of HR processes in the Visegrád countries remain manual and fragmented.
According to a 2025 four-country study, only around 40% of large corporations use an integrated HR system covering the entire employee lifecycle.
In a corporate context, this is critical because integrated talent management cannot function without a unified and reliable database. Talent review meetings, succession maps, capability profiles and career path analyses should all feed into a strategic decision-support process instead of becoming isolated number-crunching exercises.
Strategic priorities for large corporations
The international team of the Best HRM Solutions in V4 Countries project concluded that three conditions are essential for a sustainable and successful corporate talent management programme.
1.
HR must be treated as a genuine strategic partner rather than an administrative support function. As long as talent issues are absent from investment, production or sales decision-making tables, talent programmes will remain side projects at best.
2.
The focus should shift from narrowly defined tasks towards capability development. Companies that remain competitive are those that do not merely “train employees for a job”, but consciously develop adaptability, digital literacy, problem-solving and collaboration skills – in other words, transferable future-oriented competencies.
3.
A clear and well-founded strategy against brain drain is essential. If a large corporation does not explicitly define whom it wants to retain, under what conditions and with what career perspective, the market will make that decision instead – usually in favour of foreign competitors. This is not only a salary issue: professional development opportunities, leadership culture and flexibility of work are equally important.
This also requires accelerating HR digitalisation, introducing formal succession pipelines and systems, and creating short- and medium-term action plans linking talent management transformation to concrete responsibilities, KPIs and deadlines.
Because in the end, only one question remains: will our corporation become the place where the region’s best professionals build their careers – or merely a temporary stop before they move elsewhere?
Prihláste sa k odberu nášho spravodajstva!
Pridajte sa k komunite profesionálov v oblasti ľudských zdrojov v regióne V4!
Personálne riešenia založené na dôkazoch, osvedčené postupy a odborné podujatia – výhradne pre predplatiteľov. Prístup k najnovším informáciám výskumné poznatky, praktické nástroje, prípadové štúdie a pozvánky riešenie aktuálnych výziev a inovatívnych riešení v oblasti riadenia ľudských zdrojov priamo od siete odborníkov projektu.